Week 18, 2012
The workshop was very good. I can report that I learn. Also it called my attention that we were active during the course despite that all the participants were spread all over the world. Yes, the workshop was on-line.
Let me clarify, in the past I reviewed some conference papers, however I felt something was missing in my reviews.
I admit that one is constantly learning about one’s area of expertise while doing research. One can offer constructive criticism towards one’s work and the work of others when we write together. Additionally, one can be critical reader of colleagues’ work before they submit their manuscript, so one is somehow a pre-reviewer. Finally, I have learned A LOT from the feedback of those reviewers who had examine my work, despite to be painful to read sometimes.
So, what can one learn from a workshop about peer review process?
In my case, to make explicit what we know or assume tacitly. The process is the learning experience in itself, to share with others and to hear the advices from experts in this specific topic is priceless.
Last week I review some papers, and I sense that my confidence level as a reviewer has increased after the workshop. Consequently, I assumed that my performance a reviewer has improved too. There is also space for improvement, specially with practice. But I want to thank the organizers of the workshop! as well as the expositors and colleges with whom I discussed.
To close this post, I share a presentation from Marco Kalz which I honestly like and might be useful for others as well.